Contact: 0330 043 9488 | | More Contact Details | Not for profits click here

Performance League tables - Top 10s

Total Savings by Member The total value (£) of procurement and waste avoidance. This measure illustrates how much each memebr in each organisation has saved while they have been using the Warp It system. The longer the organisation has been on the system the higher the savings, generally. Use this metric to better understand how the length of time a system has been operating, and the relative time to achieve behaviour change in the staff body affects savings.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place Jessica Ingram Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £762857
2nd Place David Henderson University of Glasgow £489237
3rd Place Mary Gill University of Tasmania £375326
4 Christine The University of Queensland £323399
5 Estates Facilities Team Nottingham Trent University £304374
6 Katherine McConnell Griffith University £266738
7 Edgar University College London £240539
8 Andrew Mouat Glasgow City Council £240354
9 Alexander Ford The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust £221034
10 Paul Britton University of Salford £183175

Total Savings The total value (£) of procurement and waste avoidance. This measure illustrates how much each organisation has saved while they have been using the Warp It system. The longer the organisation has been on the system the higher the savings, generally. Use this metric to better understand how the length of time a system has been operating, and the relative time to achieve behaviour change in the staff body affects savings.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place University College London £2558273
2nd Place University of Kent £1571289
3rd Place University of Tasmania £1404593
4 University of Glasgow £1345697
5 University of Cambridge £1307518
6 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £1109365
7 The University of Queensland £1044996
8 Griffith University £976162
9 Hywel Dda University Health Board £809435
10 University of Nottingham £705751

Total Savings Per Month The total savings per month is total savings divided by the number of months the organisation has been using the system. This metric better reflects the actual relative performance of an organisation. Use this metric to estimate how much you might save per month in a highly functioning system.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place Griffith University £44371
2nd Place Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £34668
3rd Place University College London £15319
4 University of Kent £12276
5 Cardiff University £11663
6 University of Tasmania £11419
7 University of Liverpool £10921
8 East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust £10426
9 University of Cambridge £9080
10 University of Glasgow £8971

Return On Investment This metric shows how many times an organisation has saved the amount invested in the system over the year/s. That is - how many times the system has paid for itself. Use this metric to get a insight into how likely it is that the system will be financially risk free for your organisation!
Click on this icon to view The price for a Warp It subscription

PlaceOrganisationROI
1st Place University College London 614.38 x
2nd Place University of Kent 552.49 x
3rd Place University of Tasmania 493.88 x
4 Griffith University 343.24 x
5 University of Glasgow 323.17 x
6 University of Cambridge 314.01 x
7 The University of Queensland 250.96 x
8 The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust 218.55 x
9 University of Reading 194.65 x
10 Hywel Dda University Health Board 194.39 x

Carbon Saved Click on this icon to view an explanation of this metric

PlaceOrganisationCO2 Savings KG
1st Place University College London 1312800
2nd Place University of Kent 835047
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 752275
4 University of Cambridge 699368
5 University of Glasgow 655150
6 City of Edinburgh Council 586475
7 University of Tasmania 577391
8 The University of Queensland 529036
9 Griffith University 423423
10 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure 347350

Waste Avoided Click on this icon to view an explanation of this metric

PlaceOrganisationWaste Avoided KG
1st Place University of Kent 300788
2nd Place University of Glasgow 245186
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 205853
4 University of Tasmania 181018
5 City of Edinburgh Council 176218
6 Griffith University 167217
7 University College London 162989
8 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure 135369
9 University of Cambridge 122063
10 The University of Queensland 114462

Total Members This metric is the number of members each organisation has on their Warp It portal. As you can see the more members an organisation has the more likelihood that they will have an effective system.

PlaceOrganisationTotal Members
1st Place South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust 5301
2nd Place University College London 5187
3rd Place NHS Grampian 3442
4 University of Cambridge 3333
5 University of Oxford 2584
6 Imperial College London 2352
7 University of Reading 2220
8 The University of Queensland 2120
9 The University of Leeds 2079
10 Hywel Dda University Health Board 2038

Trades Per Month This metric is a reflection of the average number of trades a month. As you can see the higher number of trades generally means higher savings. However this is not always the case as many organisations use the system to trade low value but high volume items like stationery.

PlaceOrganisationTrades Per Month
1st Place Griffith University 90
2nd Place LEICESTERSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST 59
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 47
4 University of Kent 47
5 East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust 36
6 University of Glasgow 33
7 University of Tasmania 29
8 University College London 27
9 University of Liverpool 24
10 The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust 23

Savings Per Member This metric shows the value that each member can bring to your organisation. Use this figure to work out what your savings might be if you can get say, 500 staff onto your system. Or 1000! Or 10,000!

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place West Midlands Police £8229
2nd Place British Heart Foundation £3509
3rd Place Glasgow City Council £3261
4 Stevenage Bioscience Catalyst £2801
5 University of Technology Sydney £2437
6 Australian Institute of Marine Science £2235
7 An Post £1448
8 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £1358
9 Griffith University £1211
10 University of Kent £922

Donated To Charity This metric shows the top 10 donating organisation and the value of goods they have passed to charity.

PlaceOrganisationDonated To Charity
1st Place Hywel Dda University Health Board £601939
2nd Place City of Edinburgh Council £533232
3rd Place Glasgow Life £282589
4 Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust £275687
5 University College London £233919
6 University of Glasgow £194877
7 University of Kent £144948
8 Royal Devon University Healthcare £105724
9 Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust £87306
10 Swansea University £73250

Quickest Payback This metric shows the top 10 organisation who achieved payback quickest. That is the time it took from signing up to when the system paid the subscription cost. You can use this metric to get an idea on how quickly you might recover your organisation's investment.

PlaceOrganisationNo Of days until payback
1st Place NHS Tayside 9
2nd Place Royal Veterinary College 15
3rd Place The University of Queensland 18
4 LEICESTERSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST 30
5 University of Exeter 31
6 University of Technology Sydney 36
7 DORSET HEALTHCARE UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 39
8 City of Parramatta 40
9 Griffith University 40
10 Swansea University 41

Large Charity Donates The following top 10 have achieved the most value items from the system.

PlaceOrganisationAmount Given
1st Place The Edinburgh Remakery £1798053
2nd Place National Charities £885133
3rd Place East Midlands Charities £692870
4 Welsh Charities £673194
5 West Midlands Charities £593862
6 South East Charities £515520
7 Scottish Charities £343588
8 North East Charities £258743
9 Yorkshire Charities £246112
10 City of Edinburgh Council Reuse Partners £193150

Small Charity Donations The following top 10 have achieved the most value items from the system.

PlaceOrganisationAmount Given
1st Place Whitby based charity £395571
2nd Place Rom valley based charity £172730
3rd Place Kelso based charity £132766
4 MANCHESTER based charity £23342
5 Alva based charity £8612
6 Southampton based charity £6390
7 London based charity £6118
8 Lanark based charity £4468
9 Ingleby Barwick based charity £4320
10 Glasgow based charity £3942

What our customers are saying



The system is so easy to use!

Susan Davison, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

I have always hated the amount of quality items that have been trashed in the past.

This is an excellent way to reuse items no longer needed by one department, with very little cost to the receiving department.

Anon, Cheshire & Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

Excellent Service - minimising waste!

Anon, The University of Edinburgh