Contact: 0330 043 9488 | | More Contact Details | Not for profits click here

Performance League tables - Top 10s

Total Savings by Member The total value (£) of procurement and waste avoidance. This measure illustrates how much each memebr in each organisation has saved while they have been using the Warp It system. The longer the organisation has been on the system the higher the savings, generally. Use this metric to better understand how the length of time a system has been operating, and the relative time to achieve behaviour change in the staff body affects savings.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place Jessica Ingram Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £762857
2nd Place David Henderson University of Glasgow £489187
3rd Place Mary Gill University of Tasmania £374644
4 Christine The University of Queensland £323399
5 Estates Facilities Team Nottingham Trent University £304374
6 Edgar University College London £240539
7 Andrew Mouat Glasgow City Council £240354
8 Katherine McConnell Griffith University £239510
9 Alexander Ford The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust £220908
10 Paul Britton University of Salford £183116

Total Savings The total value (£) of procurement and waste avoidance. This measure illustrates how much each organisation has saved while they have been using the Warp It system. The longer the organisation has been on the system the higher the savings, generally. Use this metric to better understand how the length of time a system has been operating, and the relative time to achieve behaviour change in the staff body affects savings.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place University College London £2530677
2nd Place University of Kent £1528853
3rd Place University of Tasmania £1372449
4 University of Glasgow £1342322
5 University of Cambridge £1271344
6 The University of Queensland £1014561
7 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £921859
8 Griffith University £872270
9 Hywel Dda University Health Board £760953
10 University of Nottingham £703415

Total Savings Per Month The total savings per month is total savings divided by the number of months the organisation has been using the system. This metric better reflects the actual relative performance of an organisation. Use this metric to estimate how much you might save per month in a highly functioning system.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place Griffith University £45909
2nd Place Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £31788
3rd Place University College London £15431
4 University of Kent £12231
5 Cardiff University £12104
6 University of Tasmania £11437
7 East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust £10806
8 University of Liverpool £10248
9 University of Glasgow £9131
10 University of Cambridge £9017

Return On Investment This metric shows how many times an organisation has saved the amount invested in the system over the year/s. That is - how many times the system has paid for itself. Use this metric to get a insight into how likely it is that the system will be financially risk free for your organisation!
Click on this icon to view The price for a Warp It subscription

PlaceOrganisationROI
1st Place University College London 607.75 x
2nd Place University of Kent 537.57 x
3rd Place University of Tasmania 482.58 x
4 University of Glasgow 322.36 x
5 Griffith University 306.71 x
6 University of Cambridge 305.32 x
7 The University of Queensland 243.65 x
8 The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust 216.59 x
9 University of Reading 190.20 x
10 University of Exeter 188.68 x

Carbon Saved Click on this icon to view an explanation of this metric

PlaceOrganisationCO2 Savings KG
1st Place University College London 1294789
2nd Place University of Kent 814858
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 722453
4 University of Cambridge 684026
5 University of Glasgow 653681
6 City of Edinburgh Council 585751
7 University of Tasmania 565864
8 The University of Queensland 513162
9 Griffith University 380828
10 University of Nottingham 319057

Waste Avoided Click on this icon to view an explanation of this metric

PlaceOrganisationWaste Avoided KG
1st Place University of Kent 292506
2nd Place University of Glasgow 244708
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 197171
4 City of Edinburgh Council 176170
5 University of Tasmania 173688
6 University College London 159233
7 Griffith University 137070
8 University of Cambridge 118821
9 The University of Queensland 113301
10 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure 111900

Total Members This metric is the number of members each organisation has on their Warp It portal. As you can see the more members an organisation has the more likelihood that they will have an effective system.

PlaceOrganisationTotal Members
1st Place University College London 5091
2nd Place South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust 5087
3rd Place NHS Grampian 3346
4 University of Cambridge 3274
5 University of Oxford 2534
6 Imperial College London 2330
7 University of Reading 2189
8 The University of Queensland 2084
9 The University of Leeds 2029
10 University of Glasgow 1995

Trades Per Month This metric is a reflection of the average number of trades a month. As you can see the higher number of trades generally means higher savings. However this is not always the case as many organisations use the system to trade low value but high volume items like stationery.

PlaceOrganisationTrades Per Month
1st Place Griffith University 95
2nd Place LEICESTERSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST 63
3rd Place University of Kent 47
4 Hywel Dda University Health Board 47
5 East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust 37
6 University of Glasgow 33
7 University of Tasmania 29
8 University College London 27
9 The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust 23
10 University of Liverpool 22

Savings Per Member This metric shows the value that each member can bring to your organisation. Use this figure to work out what your savings might be if you can get say, 500 staff onto your system. Or 1000! Or 10,000!

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place West Midlands Police £6169
2nd Place British Heart Foundation £3509
3rd Place Glasgow City Council £3286
4 Stevenage Bioscience Catalyst £2603
5 University of Technology Sydney £2097
6 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £2035
7 Australian Institute of Marine Science £1598
8 An Post £1448
9 Griffith University £1213
10 University of Kent £916

Donated To Charity This metric shows the top 10 donating organisation and the value of goods they have passed to charity.

PlaceOrganisationDonated To Charity
1st Place Hywel Dda University Health Board £590313
2nd Place City of Edinburgh Council £532993
3rd Place Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust £273204
4 University College London £232419
5 University of Glasgow £194877
6 University of Kent £144948
7 Royal Devon University Healthcare £105724
8 Swansea University £73018
9 Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust £72920
10 University of South Wales £72475

Quickest Payback This metric shows the top 10 organisation who achieved payback quickest. That is the time it took from signing up to when the system paid the subscription cost. You can use this metric to get an idea on how quickly you might recover your organisation's investment.

PlaceOrganisationNo Of days until payback
1st Place NHS Tayside 9
2nd Place Royal Veterinary College 15
3rd Place The University of Queensland 18
4 LEICESTERSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST 30
5 University of Exeter 31
6 University of Technology Sydney 36
7 DORSET HEALTHCARE UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 39
8 City of Parramatta 40
9 Griffith University 40
10 Swansea University 41

Large Charity Donates The following top 10 have achieved the most value items from the system.

PlaceOrganisationAmount Given
1st Place The Edinburgh Remakery £1798053
2nd Place East Midlands Charities £692770
3rd Place Welsh Charities £654135
4 National Charities £588111
5 West Midlands Charities £582462
6 South East Charities £513875
7 Scottish Charities £325416
8 North East Charities £256623
9 Yorkshire Charities £227422
10 City of Edinburgh Council Reuse Partners £193150

Small Charity Donations The following top 10 have achieved the most value items from the system.

PlaceOrganisationAmount Given
1st Place Rom valley based charity £172730
2nd Place Kelso based charity £132766
3rd Place Whitby based charity £97541
4 MANCHESTER based charity £23342
5 Alva based charity £8612
6 Southampton based charity £6390
7 London based charity £6118
8 Lanark based charity £4468
9 Ingleby Barwick based charity £4320
10 Glasgow based charity £3942

What our customers are saying



Very quick response to password change, good email alerts and generally a great idea to recycle stuff :)

sandra white, NHS Grampian

Great service, very happy with how it works.

Anon, Lancashire Teaching Hospital

So useful - i've upgraded lots of old equipment/furniture using this service, thank you!

Aubrey Langdown, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Trusts