Contact: 0330 043 9488 | | More Contact Details | Not for profits click here

Performance League tables - Top 10s

Total Savings by Member The total value (£) of procurement and waste avoidance. This measure illustrates how much each memebr in each organisation has saved while they have been using the Warp It system. The longer the organisation has been on the system the higher the savings, generally. Use this metric to better understand how the length of time a system has been operating, and the relative time to achieve behaviour change in the staff body affects savings.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place Marius Mada University of Cambridge £1048460
2nd Place Jessica Ingram Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £762857
3rd Place David Henderson University of Glasgow £485147
4 Mary Gill University of Tasmania £358036
5 Christine The University of Queensland £323399
6 Estates Facilities Team Nottingham Trent University £301841
7 Edgar University College London £240539
8 Andrew Mouat Glasgow City Council £240354
9 Alexander Ford The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust £218627
10 Paul Britton University of Salford £183116

Total Savings The total value (£) of procurement and waste avoidance. This measure illustrates how much each organisation has saved while they have been using the Warp It system. The longer the organisation has been on the system the higher the savings, generally. Use this metric to better understand how the length of time a system has been operating, and the relative time to achieve behaviour change in the staff body affects savings.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place University College London £2503230
2nd Place University of Cambridge £2234953
3rd Place University of Kent £1464765
4 University of Glasgow £1339165
5 University of Tasmania £1291416
6 The University of Queensland £991412
7 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £911515
8 Hywel Dda University Health Board £733830
9 Griffith University £711718
10 University of Oxford £679813

Total Savings Per Month The total savings per month is total savings divided by the number of months the organisation has been using the system. This metric better reflects the actual relative performance of an organisation. Use this metric to estimate how much you might save per month in a highly functioning system.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place Griffith University £50837
2nd Place Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £37980
3rd Place University of Cambridge £16433
4 University College London £15744
5 University of Kent £12206
6 Cardiff University £12017
7 University of Tasmania £11230
8 East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust £11154
9 British Heart Foundation £10100
10 University of Glasgow £9431

Return On Investment This metric shows how many times an organisation has saved the amount invested in the system over the year/s. That is - how many times the system has paid for itself. Use this metric to get a insight into how likely it is that the system will be financially risk free for your organisation!
Click on this icon to view The price for a Warp It subscription

PlaceOrganisationROI
1st Place University College London 601.16 x
2nd Place University of Cambridge 536.73 x
3rd Place University of Kent 515.04 x
4 University of Tasmania 454.08 x
5 University of Glasgow 321.61 x
6 Griffith University 250.25 x
7 The University of Queensland 238.09 x
8 Queen's University Belfast 219.13 x
9 The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust 211.87 x
10 University of Reading 185.22 x

Carbon Saved Click on this icon to view an explanation of this metric

PlaceOrganisationCO2 Savings KG
1st Place University of Cambridge 1287817
2nd Place University College London 1282894
3rd Place University of Kent 777317
4 Hywel Dda University Health Board 704684
5 University of Glasgow 652507
6 City of Edinburgh Council 574685
7 University of Tasmania 529433
8 The University of Queensland 501466
9 Griffith University 305862
10 University of Oxford 299506

Waste Avoided Click on this icon to view an explanation of this metric

PlaceOrganisationWaste Avoided KG
1st Place University of Kent 282570
2nd Place University of Glasgow 245495
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 190327
4 City of Edinburgh Council 174571
5 University of Cambridge 164742
6 University of Tasmania 160305
7 University College London 156628
8 Griffith University 111706
9 The University of Queensland 110830
10 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure 110593

Total Members This metric is the number of members each organisation has on their Warp It portal. As you can see the more members an organisation has the more likelihood that they will have an effective system.

PlaceOrganisationTotal Members
1st Place South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust 5078
2nd Place University College London 4962
3rd Place University of Cambridge 3176
4 NHS Grampian 3091
5 University of Oxford 2447
6 Imperial College London 2284
7 University of Reading 2117
8 The University of Queensland 2020
9 The University of Leeds 1961
10 University of Glasgow 1945

Trades Per Month This metric is a reflection of the average number of trades a month. As you can see the higher number of trades generally means higher savings. However this is not always the case as many organisations use the system to trade low value but high volume items like stationery.

PlaceOrganisationTrades Per Month
1st Place Griffith University 96
2nd Place LEICESTERSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST 73
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 48
4 University of Kent 47
5 East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust 38
6 University of Glasgow 35
7 University of Tasmania 28
8 University College London 27
9 The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust 23
10 Cardiff University 21

Savings Per Member This metric shows the value that each member can bring to your organisation. Use this figure to work out what your savings might be if you can get say, 500 staff onto your system. Or 1000! Or 10,000!

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place University of Strathclyde £7778
2nd Place West Midlands Police £5025
3rd Place British Heart Foundation £3788
4 Glasgow City Council £3375
5 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £2207
6 Stevenage Bioscience Catalyst £2196
7 University of Technology Sydney £2111
8 An Post £1448
9 Northern Ireland Schools £1178
10 Griffith University £1173

Donated To Charity This metric shows the top 10 donating organisation and the value of goods they have passed to charity.

PlaceOrganisationDonated To Charity
1st Place Hywel Dda University Health Board £568898
2nd Place City of Edinburgh Council £532993
3rd Place Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust £256572
4 University College London £232419
5 University of Glasgow £194757
6 University of Kent £144284
7 Royal Devon University Healthcare £105724
8 Shropshire Council £105128
9 Swansea University £71818
10 Aberdeenshire Council £71746

Quickest Payback This metric shows the top 10 organisation who achieved payback quickest. That is the time it took from signing up to when the system paid the subscription cost. You can use this metric to get an idea on how quickly you might recover your organisation's investment.

PlaceOrganisationNo Of days until payback
1st Place NHS Tayside 9
2nd Place Royal Veterinary College 15
3rd Place The University of Queensland 18
4 LEICESTERSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST 30
5 University of Exeter 31
6 University of Technology Sydney 36
7 DORSET HEALTHCARE UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 39
8 City of Parramatta 40
9 Griffith University 40
10 Swansea University 41

Large Charity Donates The following top 10 have achieved the most value items from the system.

PlaceOrganisationAmount Given
1st Place The Edinburgh Remakery £1798053
2nd Place East Midlands Charities £651982
3rd Place Welsh Charities £630300
4 West Midlands Charities £578233
5 National Charities £571263
6 South East Charities £498301
7 Scottish Charities £308877
8 North East Charities £224547
9 Yorkshire Charities £212422
10 City of Edinburgh Council Reuse Partners £193150

Small Charity Donations The following top 10 have achieved the most value items from the system.

PlaceOrganisationAmount Given
1st Place Rom valley based charity £172730
2nd Place Kelso based charity £132766
3rd Place Whitby based charity £80453
4 MANCHESTER based charity £23342
5 Alva based charity £8612
6 Southampton based charity £6390
7 London based charity £6118
8 Lanark based charity £4468
9 Ingleby Barwick based charity £4320
10 Glasgow based charity £3942

What our customers are saying



So easy to use!

Such an excellent idea for a service!

Anon, KINGSTON HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

Only found out about it today. Will save our department some money on buying new desks. Many thanks

Anon, Northern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust

I'm all for recycling and your wee prizes from time to time are good fun!

Michéal Ó Fearraigh, Queen's University Belfast